10 Differences Between fundamental rights and directive principles

Difference between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles

What are Fundamental Rights?

Fundamental Rights are the basic human rights that are recognized by the Constitution of a country. These rights are considered essential for the overall development and well-being of individuals. They provide safeguards against arbitrary actions and ensure the dignity and freedom of every citizen.

Examples of Fundamental Rights:

  • Right to Equality
  • Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression
  • Right to Life and Personal Liberty
  • Right against Exploitation
  • Right to Constitutional Remedies

Uses of Fundamental Rights:

Fundamental Rights ensure that every citizen has the right to equality, freedom of speech, protection from discrimination, and access to justice. They act as a check on the power of the government and safeguard the rights and liberties of individuals.

What are Directive Principles?

Directive Principles are guidelines or principles that are meant to guide the state in framing laws and policies. They are non-justiciable rights, which means they are not legally enforceable in a court of law. Directive Principles aim to promote the welfare of the people and establish a just society.

Examples of Directive Principles:

  • Equal pay for equal work
  • Protection of the environment
  • Provision of free and compulsory education to children
  • Promotion of cottage industries
  • Equal justice and free legal aid

Uses of Directive Principles:

Directive Principles provide a framework for the government to promote social justice, economic welfare, and the overall development of the country. They guide the government in formulating policies that ensure a just society and improve the quality of life for all citizens.

Differences between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles:

Difference Area Fundamental Rights Directive Principles
Legally Enforceable Yes No
Nature Individual rights Social and economic principles
Violation Consequence Judicial remedy available No direct judicial remedy available
Enforcement Judicial enforcement Non-judicial enforcement
Aim Protect individual liberties Promote social justice and welfare
Origin Explicitly mentioned in the Constitution Derived from the Constitution
Justiciability Justiciable rights Non-justiciable rights
Enforcement Authority Supreme Court and High Courts No specific authority
Scope Protect fundamental freedoms Direct the state in policy-making
Application Applies to all citizens Applies to the state


In conclusion, fundamental rights are legally enforceable individual rights explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, while directive principles are non-justiciable social and economic principles that guide the state in policy-making. Fundamental rights aim to protect individual liberties, while directive principles aim to promote social justice and welfare. Despite their differences, both play a crucial role in ensuring a just and equitable society.

People Also Ask:

  • What is the difference between fundamental rights and directive principles?
    The main difference is that fundamental rights are legally enforceable individual rights, while directive principles are non-justiciable principles that guide the state in policy-making.
  • Are fundamental rights justiciable?
    Yes, fundamental rights are justiciable, which means they can be enforced in a court of law.
  • Are directive principles enforceable?
    Directive principles are not enforceable in a court of law as they are non-justiciable.
  • What is the purpose of fundamental rights?
    The purpose of fundamental rights is to protect individual liberties and safeguard against arbitrary actions by the government.
  • How do directive principles promote social justice?
    Directive principles guide the government in formulating policies that ensure social justice by promoting equal pay, free education, and justice for all.

Leave a Comment

content of this page is protected

Scroll to Top